Versace 1997-98 (The V&A)

2006AH1926_versace_coat_aw_9293_custom_290x373_06100786 2006AH1857_versace_dress_ss_96_custom_290x373_06100786 2006AH1939_versace_dress_ss_94_custom_290x400_061043886 2006AH1968_versace_dress_aw_9596_custom_290x400_061039882 2006AH1916_versace_dress_aw_9091_custom_290x404_06100851 2006AH1956_versace_dress_ss_94_custom_290x404_06100851 2006AH1879_versace_dress_theatre_1987_custom_290x325_06100684 2006AH1830_versace_dress_aw_9798_custom_290x290_463656325

Versace was a man of inexhaustible energy and enthusiasm. He delighted in all forms of creativity and loved museums, including the V&A.  Versace had a deep feeling for his heritage and the role of dress, commenting, ‘I come from a land with a rich history . . . its roots are old, ancient roots, that knew the aristocracy of sculptural draperies.’ Versace’s encyclopaedic knowledge and respect for the past liberated him. He achieved an equilibrium between the historical and the modern which, though audacious, was never disrespectful.

Versace was an avid collector of 20th-century art, from Picasso to Jasper Johns. He paid tribute to the graphic power of pop artist Roy Lichtenstein and appropriated Andy Warhol’s celebrity portraits for his printed dress fabrics. In a playful twist, he adorned a gown with the covers of Vogue magazine demonstrating that his clothing, while it may not have been fine art, could certainly be ‘artful’.

Source – http://www.vam.ac.uk/content/articles/g/gianni-versace/

Giorgio Armani 2000-1 (The RA 2003-4)

‘The RA is hardly the first fine art museum to conceive of couture as living sculpture. The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York has staged a number of exhibitions devoted to contemporary clothing and fashion, notably its 1984 retrospective of couturier extraordinaire Yves Saint Laurent. That show also cause the kind of furore that has surrounded the Armani exhibitions during its appearance in New York and London – the supposed ideological battle of high art versus popular culture. But while many say that fashion is too commercial to be treated as art – and of course, it is a huge industry – there has always been crossover between the two world. Think of Schiparelli and the surrealists or the Op art of Bridget Riley and fashion of the psychedelic 0’s to name just a couple of examples … it’s invigorating and, to my mind, essential, for museums to expose visitors to fresh visual experience and ideas. A wider remit afford the public what Joseph Beuys called an expanded concept of art. And I’m certain that buys, whom I knew well and who was very fashion conscious in his own way, would not have disapproved of Saint Laurent at the Met or Armani at the Royal Academy. I only wish that artists and curators alike would occasionally make more use of such mind-streching concepts.’


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s